Um, no.

May. 29th, 2011 12:27 pm
ladybug_archive: (schrank)
[personal profile] ladybug_archive
While trying to see if I could Google up any interviews with Simon Oakland (I couldn't, although I found an amusing anecdote concerning his Outer Limits guest-spot), I found a mini-biography someone wrote of him in which they called Lieutenant Schrank an out-and-out villain. They also called him bigoted and couldn't get his rank right. They called him Officer Schrank.

I've already expounded my thoughts on the character, including that it's not conclusive from movie canon that he is bigoted. (Book canon is something else, according to Ladyamberjo. But the book really seems to be a different version of everything anyway.) He makes equally terrible comments to members of both gangs. However, that alone certainly does not make him an out-and-out villain (or any kind of villain). I like and agree with what [livejournal.com profile] pleasant_valley said, that pretty much all the characters are flawed in some way. To decide that Schrank (or really, any one character) is the villain in West Side Story is, I think, missing the whole point of the story in the first place.

And I can't get away from his guilt and shame over what he said, and his telling comment to Doc, "You try keeping a bunch of hoodlums in line and see what it does to you!" That doesn't sound like an out-and-out villain to me.

I think I finally finished a project I've been working on. I posted it at the Kolchak comm. And I'm hoping I won't decide later that it's not done after all. This is the second edition; the first is stuck in queue at the essay comm I signed up for. While waiting for it to go up, I realized it wasn't done and started tinkering with it again.

And I must see lots of Car 54, Where Are You?, a hysterical police comedy from the early sixties! It's another series I've carried a casual interest in for years, but previously had no access to. I tracked down the episode Simon Oakland guest-stars in, Hail to the Chief, and it's absolutely priceless. He plays a Secret Service agent trying to evaluate whether the two nutty main characters are fit to transport the President of the United States from the airport to the UN building. Nonsense ensues! I haven't laughed so hard all the way through a show in a while. Simon's character has his trademark reactions to the sheer goofiness around him, and at the end, after others are finally convinced that the officers are not fit for the task, he holds them at gunpoint in his office until the President can be safely delivered back to the White House by other police. It was so satisfying to see that Simon's character was finally believed, and from his expression in that last scene, I think he felt the same.

It's the first time I've seen Simon in a sitcom where he plays a scene for deliberate humor (with his frantic and comic attempt to get others to believe him that something is wrong). But there's also plenty of him being the straightman, too. And he wears a fedora for most of the episode, as he did in West Side Story. Yessss. I love fedoras in general, and he looks so good in them.

Date: 2011-05-29 06:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rose-of-pollux.livejournal.com
(Ooh, do you have the link to that Outer Limits anecdote?) Yeah, I was curious if there was an interview with him... Oh, well...

Urgh. Officer Shrank? The heck? They clearly mixed him up with Krupke, if that's the case. Based on what he said in the bar, he hardly seems like a villain at all--he's just trying to keep the peace on those dangerous streets. Granted, it's been a while since I've seen the movie, but, still...

And that was an awesome essay. Yes.

LOL, that Car 54 ep was hilarious. Simon had some classic moments in there--and his facial expressions were a hoot.

And yes... fedoras are love. ♥

Date: 2011-05-29 08:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] pleasant-valley.livejournal.com
Fedora's are ♥.
Always loved when the Monkees found an excuse to wear them.

To be fair when I just watch West Side Story I feel insanely frustrated by most of the characters actions, it's like every outcome could have been so easily prevented.
Maybe that's why I cant view Schrank as an out and out villian, he like almost everyone else is a victim of circumstance and I can't help but think that the things he has witnessed and the things he can't seem to prevent probably play a role in his attitude. I don't agree with the things he says (although I really don't think his comments towards the Sharks are anything other than a desperate attempt at begging favor with the Jets in order to get information from them) but surely by acknowledging the fact that the way he acts and the things he says are suspect shows that he is at least aware of his behaviour and he certainly doesn't give the impression of someone that is particularly proud of it.
Yep, I definitely view the characters as kind of grey when it comes to who are heroes or villians - even seemingly good guy Tony is a notorious gang member (albeit an unlikely one) who winds up killing a man.

April 2017

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
910111213 1415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 29th, 2025 12:35 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios